Big Update in Case On House Democrat Charged With Striking ICE Agent

Several posts on X made by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) referencing a May incident at the Delaney Hall immigrant detention center in New Jersey, in which U.S. Representative LaMonica McIver was charged with assaulting federal immigration officers, have been removed following an order from Biden-appointed U.S. District Judge Jamel Semper.

Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was charged in May with assaulting federal immigration officers during a congressional visit to the Delaney Hall immigrant detention center in Newark.

McIver has pleaded not guilty and faces up to 17 years in prison if convicted.

McIver argued that the charges violate the Constitutionโ€™s Speech or Debate Clause and are politically motivated, though she was seen on video physically pushing and striking a federal ICE agent.

 

 

 

After the May incident, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued several statements and social media posts criticizing Rep. McIver and other Democratic lawmakers who visited the Delaney Hall facility that day.

In response, McIverโ€™s legal team filed a motion seeking to prohibit the government from making what they described as โ€œextrajudicial statementsโ€ that could prejudice the ongoing legal proceedings, according to the New Jersey Globe. The motion cited eight posts on X and one official press release as examples,ย Newsweek reported.

โ€œAs of this afternoon, the posts referenced in Defense Exhibits N through U have been removed,โ€ U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche noted in a legal filing dated October 30, Newsweek reported. โ€œThe post referenced in Defense Exhibit V, however, remains available on X.com, as it appears to be controlled by a journalist and private citizen, and the Government lacks the authority to remove the post.โ€

 

 

 

 

The development follows a hearing held on October 21, during which Judge Semper heard arguments from both the Department of Justice and McIverโ€™s legal team. At that time, the court directed the government to remove the posts and provide an update within a week.

However, eight days later, the Department of Justice had not complied, according to a November 6 letter from McIverโ€™s attorney, Lee Cortes, to the judge, Newsweek added.

 

 

 

 

โ€ โ€ฆ [E]ven with the additional time, DHS again has failed to remove all of the public statements that Congresswoman McIver brought to the governmentโ€™s and the Courtโ€™s attention,โ€ Cortes wrote in the letter.

Cortes went on to ask the court to issue sanctions if the DHS were to post such statements about McIver again.

โ€œDHS has slow-walked the removal of clearly prejudicial statements, issued new ones, and continued to maintain others on its website. Without a further order from the Court, Congresswoman McIver will be forced to continue โ€˜play[ing] Whac-A-Moleโ€™ with โ€˜government officialsโ€™โ€ฆsaying things that have absolutely no connection to the indictment,โ€ Cortes noted, according to Newsweek.

One of the posts from DHS that was removed stated: โ€œDelaney Hall Detention Center houses the WORST OF THE WORST! This stunt by sanctuary lawmakers puts the safety of our law enforcement agents and detainees at risk.โ€

Another post referenced McIver: โ€œWhat happened on May 9 at Delaney Hall was not oversight. It was a political stunt that put the safety of our law enforcement agents, our staff, and our detainees at risk. This behavior was lawless, and it was beneath this body. Members of Congress are not above the law.โ€

McIver appeared in federal court last month as she continued to fight a three-count indictment accusing her of impeding and interfering with federal officers at the Newark, N.J., ICE detention facility in May.

Semper did not rule on McIverโ€™s motion to dismiss the charges but raised concerns about Department of Homeland Security statements online referencing the incident.

The judge said it was prejudicial for โ€œfact-freeโ€ social media posts from government officials to remain public while McIverโ€™s case is pending, warning they could taint a future jury pool


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *